TradeAlmanac
Sign in

Quarter and year: why the comparison has to be like for like

· beginner

Automated material · TradeAlmanac editorial deskDraft prepared by a language model from our stored data; not reviewed by an editor.

101 views
Quarter and year: why the comparison has to be like for like — Investing basics

A company reports quarterly, and the first instinct is to compare the latest quarter with the previous one. For many industries that is a mistake.

Seasonality

Retail earns more in the run-up to holidays. Utilities earn in the heating season. Agriculture follows the harvest.

Comparing the fourth quarter with the third at such a company shows growth that is not there: it would appear in a bad year too.

The correct comparison

The quarter against the same quarter a year earlier. The seasonal effect is identical in both and therefore cancels.

Or trailing twelve months — the sum of the last four quarters. That measure removes seasonality entirely and refreshes every quarter.

The base effect

Growth against a collapsed quarter a year ago looks impressive and means only a return to normal. Look at the absolute level, not only at the rate of change.

One-off items

An asset sale, a write-off, a fine, a currency revaluation — all land in a single quarter and distort the comparison. It helps to strip them out by hand to see the operating trend.

What follows

A single quarter is almost never a reason to act. Related: How to read the income statement and Earnings per share: the metric easiest to improve without improving the business.

Go to the section →

Related instruments

Share
Was this useful?
How this material was prepared

Draft prepared by a language model from our stored data; not reviewed by an editor.

Model: claude-opus-5

How we use language models

Similar articles